Those only slightly too long are highlighted in yellow. The complicated, long sentences will glow red, drawing your attention first. Hemingway highlights the sentences it dislikes and makes you stop and think before continuing. Language analysis, and suggestions for fixes, stand at the core of Hemingway, and are its most useful feature by far. My hope is that the list will serve as a useful guideline when considering the tool for daily use.
#Hemingway editor reviews code
As a programmer, I’m also interested in how Hemingway handles things like code and Markdown (MD) syntax. The list may or may not apply to you it depends on how much writing or editing you do and in which format. I’ve taken a thorough look at Hemingway Editor 2, and what follows is a list of pros and cons. The app is also coupled with a built-in spellchecker for several English dialects. Typical fixes include shorter sentences, active instead of passive voice, and fewer adverbs. It keeps an eye on one’s phrasing and sentence structure, and suggests fixes. It is where tools like Hemingway can help most. This, in turn, prevents the wasting of time. Automation allows editors to focus more on content and code. So it’s important to be able to automate as much of the low-mental-effort work as possible. There’s formatting, language corrections, image processing, code testing, syntax highlights, and more. This may not be obvious, but a lot goes into making the drafts publishable. Hundreds of emails and dozens of drafts fly before my eyes every week. Now, a year later, our resident PHP editor Bruno Skvorc takes a look at Hemingway Editor 2 to see how it stacks up-particularly from a technical writer’s point of view.Īs SitePoint’s editor for the PHP channel, I deal with a lot of text. At the time, Jacco decided he'd rather stick with the online version of Hemingway-not least because of a display bug in the desktop version. In 2014, Jacco Blankenspoor took a look at Hemingway Editor's new desktop app.
0 kommentar(er)
